Degrees Don't Guarantee Intelligence

Americans worship college degrees like they mean something beyond passing tests and writing papers. A diploma hanging on the wall supposedly proves intelligence, leadership ability, critical thinking. During election season, this assumption becomes genuinely dangerous when candidates treat their educational résumés as qualification enough for public office.

Education and intelligence share a relationship, but they are not the same thing. Research shows schooling can improve certain cognitive skills. What it cannot teach is judgment, wisdom, or the ability to lead effectively. Plenty of people hold multiple degrees while demonstrating zero common sense. Meanwhile, someone who never set foot in a university classroom might understand complex problems better than any professor.

Universities certify that students completed coursework. They cannot certify judgment, character, or actual understanding. The person who memorized enough material to graduate might fall apart when facing real decisions. The self-taught individual could grasp issues more deeply through lived experience than any textbook could provide.

Campaign season exposes this gap brutally. Candidates rattle off their schools, expecting applause. Harvard. Stanford MBA. Yale Law. The message implies these institutions automatically make someone qualified to govern. They do not.

Credential worship keeps working people out of leadership. Families who couldn't afford tuition get dismissed despite having exactly what their communities need. The single parent who worked two jobs instead of attending college understands economic hardship better than economics professors. The factory worker who survived plant closures knows more about industrial policy than consultants who merely studied it.

Immigrant communities prove this point constantly. First-generation Americans carry wisdom from parents who endured circumstances that would destroy most degree holders. These families navigate bureaucracy, stretch limited resources, and overcome institutional barriers at levels universities never test. Their intelligence shows up through survival, adaptation, and problem-solving that classrooms cannot teach.

Book smart versus street smart determines whether politicians can actually govern. Book smart candidates write impressive policy papers that ignore how things work in practice. Street-smart leaders know where systems break down, what solutions communities will accept, and how to make things happen. Theory without application creates laws that sound good but fail people.

Politicians use degrees to fake authority they haven't earned. Educational credentials substitute for actual expertise. Candidates name-drop prestigious schools to distract from accomplishing nothing substantial. Academic pedigree becomes social proof when real achievements don't exist.

This manipulation hits marginalized communities hardest. Working-class voters hear their experience matters less than someone's thesis. Communities of color watch outsiders with fancy degrees show up claiming to understand struggles they never faced. The message says intelligence only counts when institutions stamp it approved, erasing generations of wisdom built outside those gates.

Voters should ask what candidates actually did, not where they went to school. What problems did they solve? Which communities did they serve? What did they build without connections or money smoothing the path? These questions reveal capability. Transcripts do not.

Someone who built something from nothing proves resourcefulness. Someone who served their community before running for office shows real commitment. Someone who succeeded despite obstacles demonstrates resilience. These qualities matter infinitely more than which university accepted their application.

Knowledge without wisdom creates terrible leaders. Candidates might understand economic theory while pushing policies that wreck working families. They studied constitutional law while trampling civil liberties. Academic success means nothing without empathy, ethics, and accountability.

Real intelligence shows through action. Candidates who started from zero know what constituents actually face. They understand barriers because they navigated them personally. Their solutions come from reality, not theory. No tuition payment replicates that knowledge.

Résumés stuffed with prestigious degrees often hide incompetence. Credentials become distractions from thin records. Voters who care more about educational pedigree than proven ability let mediocrity hide behind institutional validation.

Intelligence reveals itself through matching words with actions. Through staying humble while standing firm. Through fixing root problems instead of symptoms. Through lifting communities up instead of using them. None of this requires a bachelor's degree.

The smartest person in the room might have no letters after their name. The dumbest might be whoever built their entire identity on those letters. Voters who understand this will demand more than academic credentials. They will require proof of real work, actual sacrifice, genuine service.

Communities deserve representatives who earned their position through merit, not connections. Candidates who started from zero and built something meaningful already proved what matters most. Not intelligence validated by institutions, but wisdom earned through struggle.

@Santitos

@salinasmariasantos

Copyright © 2026 Maria Santos Salinas for FRONTeras.

All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Sharing the original posts or links from FRONTeras on social media is allowed and appreciated.