AI Roasts Its Own Creator

Grok just delivered the most delicious clapback in artificial intelligence history. Elon Musk's own chatbot, the one he built presumably to combat what he considers censorship on other platforms, just ranked him number one on its list of accounts spreading the most misinformation on X.

The irony is equivalent to his net worth.

Grok was asked to identify the five X accounts most responsible for spreading lies and misleading information. The AI analyzed aggregated data from 2025 reports compiled by organizations including the Center for Countering Digital Hate, NewsGuard, and Reuters. It evaluated mentions, estimated impact, post views, and engagement during critical events like elections.

Grok delivered: @elonmusk tops the list for high-visibility posts on elections, health, and global events that fact-checkers have debunked as misleading. His posts reach billions of views. Second place goes to @realDonaldTrump for political and election-related falsehoods with massive amplification. Third is @RobertKennedyJr, flagged for anti-vaccine content and health misinformation that extends into political conspiracies. Fourth is @TuckerCarlson, noted for polarizing narratives on politics, health, and media that spread rapidly. Fifth is @RealAlexJones, known for conspiracy theories with significant viral reach following his reinstatement on the platform.

Misinformation isn't simply being wrong. It's the deliberate or reckless spread of false or misleading information presented as fact. When public figures with massive platforms share unverified claims about election fraud, vaccine safety, or geopolitical events without evidence, they're not engaging in legitimate debate. They're polluting the information ecosystem with assertions that collapse under scrutiny.

The distinction matters because misinformation erodes the foundation of critical thinking. When people encounter contradictory information streams, they default to sources that confirm existing beliefs regardless of accuracy. People mistake this intellectual laziness for independent thinking, but the veneer of skepticism is painfully thin.

Critical thinking requires evaluating claims based on evidence and adjusting conclusions when new information emerges. Misinformation short-circuits that process by flooding the zone with so many competing narratives that distinguishing truth from fiction becomes exhausting.

Nobody with functioning brain cells finds this list shocking. What makes this revelation spectacular is the source. Musk created Grok as his answer to ChatGPT, positioning it as the truth-teller, the champion of free speech absolutism against what he called liberal bias in other AI models.

Then his own creation called him out.

Grok operates on logic. Pure, unadulterated algorithmic analysis that doesn't care about ego or brand protection. It reviewed the data, applied its programming, and identified patterns. The fact that its creator sits atop that pyramid isn't something it can ignore simply because acknowledging it creates awkwardness.

The beautiful thing about logic is its immunity to feelings. Data either supports a conclusion or it doesn't. Grok looked at billions of posts, cross-referenced them with fact-checking reports from multiple reputable organizations, measured reach and impact, and produced results based on objective criteria.

Musk can't argue with his own algorithm without admitting he built something flawed. If Grok is wrong about him, then his entire AI project loses credibility. If Grok is right, then he's the platform's chief purveyor of bullshit.

The other four accounts share a common thread beyond their staggering reach. Trump's election fraud claims have been debunked in court proceedings across multiple states. Kennedy's anti-vaccine propaganda contradicts decades of peer-reviewed medical research. Carlson's narratives regularly require corrections from the very sources he cites. Jones built an entire media empire on conspiracy theories so egregious he's lost multiple defamation lawsuits.

These aren't marginal figures shouting into the void. Their combined audience spans hundreds of millions of people. When they spread misinformation, it metastasizes across the platform, gets picked up by smaller accounts, enters mainstream discourse, and influences real-world behavior and policy.

Logic doesn't impose loyalty. It can't be threatened or bribed or convinced to look the other way. Grok will continue fact-checking posts on X using the same methodology that landed its creator at the top of this mortifying list, or it will meet its demise if Musk chooses to modify it.

The machine speaks truth even when truth is inconvenient. That's either the most brilliant feature Musk ever built or the most catastrophic oversight, depending on how much he values accuracy.

@Santitos

@salinasmariasantos

Copyright © 2026 Maria Santos Salinas for FRONTeras.